We know the situation in Iraq is improving. That seems to be indisputable by all but the Harry and Nancy fanatics/defenders.
I'm wondering about Iran (Israel, Lebanon, Syria; heck, the entire Middle East if things really get out of hand), an attack on U.S. soil, or a completely unforeseen attack. Who benefits?
For example, if there is an attack on U.S. soil, I can see that being a + or - for the Administration and Republicans.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
It depends entirely on factors we can't foresee, especially the attack on U.S. soil bit. (Though we do know that the left will blame Bush for it and the right will blame the left and I will blame Hillary.)
The left will be fractured; between blaming Bush and global warming. What to do?
Post a Comment