So this is where we are: YouTube and the nanny State - in other words, lost.
Republican candidates for President are subjected to unimportant questions planted by activists for Democratic candidates (CNN?) and Democratic candidates answer ridiculous questions (do you like diamonds or pearls?). The attempts at humor are sad and misplaced. Are adults in charge?
Why are we letting the ridiculously nutty radical PC left do this? They are pathetic and yet we are granting them strength way beyond their number (few) and substance (none). A start would be for the Republicans to find a spine and tell CNN and MSNBC to take a long walk off a short pier.
Not one question about healthcare, but we had to endure a nonsensical rant about the Confederate flag.
Hillary Clinton is a bizarre (she married Bill Clinton), lying, manipulative candidate who is not worthy of the United States Presidency, notwithstanding her years of experience as Bill Clinton's wife and travel companion, and her fellow Democratic candidates are equally unworthy (for different reasons).
ANY Republican candidate, except Ron the Pacifist Paul, would be a better choice. They are far from perfect, but they have ideas and they aren't disgusting.
Think before you vote!
2 comments:
I look at this slate of "Presidential" candidates and I can't believe this is the best we can do. Sad sad sad. I can't believe I'm saying it, but where is our Sarkozy?
That's like wishing for a Reagan. Sarkozy is one of a kind and if any place needed him; it's France. They have a long way to go.
As far as our Presidential candidates are concerned, I think we're pretty darn lucky that anyone wants to run what with the stresses that are inherent in the position and the vindictiveness of the MSM. The only dangerous candidates are donkeys and Ron Paul.
Post a Comment